Tuesday, October 21, 2025

Marlins Most Efficient Team in 2025

The Marlins were the most cost-efficient team in baseball this year – spending a mere $859,000 per win – the only team under $1 million.

The least-efficient: the big-spending Mets, who spent $4.1 million per win – and still faltered against the Marlins in the final weekend of the season to miss the playoffs.

For those who did get into the post-season, the most efficient were the Guardians, who got into the first round with $1.14 million per win (MPW). The smartest spending came from the small-market Brewers, who paid $1.25 MPW million per win and made it all the way to the National League championship.

This is my eighth year measuring costs per win. I use Spotrac for salaries, because they measure all expenses, including injured and “buried,” meaning players getting paid who are now longer with the club. The Marlins, for example, paid the long-gone Avisail Garcia $12 million this year and the invisible Wu-Suk Go $2.75 million. (Next year, the Fish will start giving the Yankees $10 million annually to help pay for Giancarlo Stanton.)

Last year, four of the first seven most efficient teams made the playoffs. This year, it was three of the first eight – Guardians, Brewers and Reds.

Smart spending can get a team into the playoffs, but when it comes to going all the way, big bucks still pave the way for ultimate victory. The last time a small-market team won a World Series was 2015 with the Royals.

This year, the super-charged Dodgers have the highest payroll in baseball: $350.3 million. They spent $3.8 MPW – three times as much as the Brewers. The four starting pitchers they used to beat Milwaukee earned $93.3 million (and this number was artificially low because I counted only half of Otani’s $28.2 million he received, a misleading number since most of his contract is deferred far into the future.) Five teams’ total payroll was less than the Dodgers’ starters.

The Bluejay weren’t cheapskates. Their $255 million was seventh highest in the majors. They spent almost $1 million more per win than the Mariners did during the regular season.

Of course, it doesn’t take a lot of front-office talent to have a small payroll and lose a lot of games: The Pirates and the A’s are notable examples. Still, they don’t compare with the Rockies, who managed a meager 43 wins despite having a middle-level payroll. Each Colorado win cost $3 million – the same as the big-bucks Phillies.

Then there are teams who are dreadfully inefficient over many seasons. The Angels lead this list. They spend a lot of money every season, but they haven’t been in the playoffs since 2014, when they were swept by the Royals in the first round. This year, the Angels spent $2.8 MPW – more than twice the Brewers’ rate. In fact, nine teams made the post-season by spending less per win than the Angels.

What about the Rays? For my first six years, they made the playoffs with tiny salaries – often leading in cost per win. But they’ve now missed the post-season two years in a row. In 2025, they had fewer wins than the resurgent Marlins.

The Orioles too have been sliding downhill – wins declining, costs going up. This year, 14 teams were more efficient.

What to make of the Braves? They were awful this year – with fewer wins than the Marlins although their payroll was three times as much. Atlanta blamed injuries – and they had a lot. Players on the injured list cost them $68 million, according to Spotrac, but the successful Bluejays spent $70 million on injured players. The underachieving Rangers led that category with $103 million injured. All three of these teams spent more on injured than the Marlins did on their total payroll.

Here's the complete list. Playoff teams in bold face.

TEAMS

PAYROLL

WINS

WINS/$

MILLIONS

Marlins

67.9

79

0.85

A's

79.1

76

1.04

Rays

87.6

77

1.14

Guardians

100.4

88

1.14

Pirates

84.4

71

1.19

Brewers

121.7

97

1.25

White Sox

78.8

60

1.31

Reds

119.5

83

1.43

Royals

136.3

82

1.66

Nationals

110

66

1.68

Cardinals

131.2

78

1.68

Tigers

157.6

87

1.81

Mariners

164.5

90

1.83

Twins

131.3

70

1.88

Orioles

159.5

75

2.12

Giants

178.3

81

2.2

Dbacks

179

80

2.24

Red Sox

200.9

89

2.25

Cubs

211.9

92

2.3

Padres

216.8

90

2.41

Astros

232.9

87

2.68

Bluejays

255.3

94

2.72

Rangers

226

81

2.79

Angels

206.7

72

2.87

Braves

218.8

76

2.88

Rockies

128.6

43

2.99

Phillies

290.3

96

3.02

Yankees

305.2

94

3.24

Dodgers

350.3

93

3.77

Mets

342.4

83

4.12

 

No comments: